White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

USING COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS TO ADDRESS HEALTH INEQUALITY CONCERNS

Love-Koh, James (2018) USING COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS TO ADDRESS HEALTH INEQUALITY CONCERNS. PhD thesis, University of York.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Text
James Love-Koh PhD Thesis corrected 22 Feb.pdf - Examined Thesis (PDF)
Restricted until 22 February 2023.

Request a copy

Abstract

Little quantitative assessment of health inequality impacts occurs in the economic evaluation of health care. Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) offers an extension to cost-effectiveness analysis, estimating health inequality changes alongside population health. This thesis addresses two important methodological and empirical challenges for DCEAs. First, in order to measure inequality change, a baseline level distribution of health needs to be estimated. English health survey and national mortality data to are used to predict lifetime health, finding a gap between the most and least healthy fifths of the population of 10.97 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The second chapter estimates how the health effects of health care budget changes in England are allocated between social groups. Socioeconomic distributions of health care utilisation by disease, age and gender are used to disaggregate results from a previous study that estimated effects of expenditure by disease area. A substantial gradient in health effects is found, with 27% and 13% incurred by the most and least deprived fifths of the population, respectively. We apply the findings of the previous chapters to two different types of DCEA. The fourth chapter proposes a simplified version of DCEA, in which intervention health benefits follow the gender and socioeconomic patterns of health care utilisation. This approach is applied to 27 technology appraisals conducted by NICE: five interventions increase population health and worsen inequality and all still increase social welfare even when inequality aversion is high. The fifth chapter covers a full DCEA to evaluate smoking cessation interventions. A decision model is adapted to incorporate a wide range of key model inputs varied by socioeconomic status. As effectiveness and uptake are greater in the least deprived groups, all interventions increase health inequality, despite the greater number of smokers in the more deprived groups.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Related URLs:
Academic Units: The University of York > Economics and Related Studies (York)
Depositing User: James Love-Koh
Date Deposited: 28 Mar 2018 13:22
Last Modified: 28 Mar 2018 13:22
URI: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/19531

Available Versions of this Item

Please use the 'Request a copy' link(s) above to request this thesis. This will be sent directly to someone who may authorise access.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.

Actions (repository staff only: login required)