Theoretical and practical approaches to exploring resilience in young people aged 12-18 years

This thesis sought to explore the conceptualisation of resilience in relation to young people under the age of 18 years. The results from Systematic Review One (see chapter two) provided a theoretical foundation for the thesis. Study One (see chapter three) explored young people’s (aged 16-17 years) conceptualisation of resilience and factors that promote and hinder resilience in young people. Systematic Review Two (see chapter four) investigated valid and reliable measures of resilience when conducting research with young people aged 12-17 years. Study Two (see chapter five) enabled the identification and quantification of the activities encompassed within an Outdoor and Adventurous Activity Programme (OAAP). This study aimed to evidence the planning and delivery of an OAAP that would inform the method and measurement for Study Three. Study Three (see chapter six) was designed to examine the long-term impact of participation in an OAAP on resilience in young people aged 14 to 15 years. This study was developed from the findings of Systematic Review One, Study One, Systematic Review Two and Study Two and used the Belief Resilience and Adventure in Youth (BRAVERY) survey. Study Four (see chapter seven) was designed to examine the factors associated with low response rate and high attrition of Study Three. This study sought the views of young people under the age of 16 years regarding willingness to participate in mental health research. In synthesising the thesis findings the discussions and conclusions identify three areas of future research, firstly the role of bravery and dedication in resilience development in young people. Secondly the need for more robust psychometric analysis of resilience measures and finally, the methods for increasing the participation of young people in mental health research.