Proctor, Tracey (2004) Empathy and theory of mind in offenders with intellectual disabilities. DClinPsy thesis, University of Sheffield.
Abstract
Section 1: Literature Review Page 1
This literature review considers the existing research on empathy and theory of
mind in offenders with intellectual disabilities, beginning with definition of the
terms and discussion of the importance of considering empathy in terms of its
components. Due to a lack of research specific to this area, the review summarises
and brings together findings from the separate fields of empathy and theory of mind
in offenders and empathy and theory of mind in people with intellectual disabilities ..
Existing findings are inconclusive, leaving uncertainty about whether offenders are
more or less skilled than non-offenders in these areas and further research is
therefore necessary.
Section 2: Research Report Page 41
A quantitative comparison IS carried out between a group of offenders with
intellectual disabilities and a group of non-offenders with intellectual disabilities. on
measures of empathy and theory of mind. Offenders performed significantly better
than non-offenders on some sub-tasks, with all other comparisons showing no
significant differences between groups. It is concluded that the present methodology
and philosophy of considering empathy and theory of mind as composite concepts
should be utilised in future research to clarify the issue.
Section 3: Critical Appraisal Page 80
A critical appraisal of the research process, this section discusses both the personal
and professional issues that affected the work and comments further on its
methodological limitations and clinical implications.
Metadata
Awarding institution: | University of Sheffield |
---|---|
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Science (Sheffield) > Psychology (Sheffield) |
Identification Number/EthosID: | uk.bl.ethos.412763 |
Depositing User: | EThOS Import Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2016 12:29 |
Last Modified: | 03 Nov 2016 12:29 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:14634 |
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.