White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

American Polities: Statecraft in Post-Revolutionary Argentina and the United States, 1776-1828

JONES, DAVID (2018) American Polities: Statecraft in Post-Revolutionary Argentina and the United States, 1776-1828. PhD thesis, University of York.

[img] Text
MOST CURRENT VERSION .pdf - Examined Thesis (PDF)
Restricted until 25 May 2024.

Request a copy


American Polities offers an extended comparison of post-revolutionary statecraft in Argentina and the United States, new states that acquired sovereignty in matters of security, war and trade. I argue that policymakers looked to develop war-making capabilities in order to resist future European aggression at the same time as attempting to create peaceful regimes of interstate relations in the Americas. In fiscal and economic policy, Argentina and the US founded their ability to finance war by selling public bonds to creditors, which would be repaid using taxation on international trade. Policymakers recognised the risks attendant in founding national security on international trade in a context in which the flow of commerce between nations could be interrupted by powerful foreign navies. The US and Argentina adopted divergent approaches to reforming their economies in order to maximise security and wealth. In matters of international relations, the two new republics followed similar approaches. Both agreed that becoming entangled in systems of permanent alliances would lead to constant conflict with European powers while offering no benefit to the Americas, while recognising the need to temporarily involve themselves in European affairs to maintain the balance of power. Domestically, however, US policymakers insisted that only the political union of the entire North American continent under one federal government could create perpetual peace, whereas Argentine policymakers believed that the establishment of an American international law could create peace between several sovereignties. Finally, the thesis charts how national security concerns led both polities to war, compares the performance of the two states as war-making polities, and evaluates the impact of policymaking on post-revolutionary war-making capabilities.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Academic Units: The University of York > History (York)
Depositing User: Mr DAVID JONES
Date Deposited: 04 Jun 2019 13:39
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2019 13:39
URI: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/24130

Please use the 'Request a copy' link(s) above to request this thesis. This will be sent directly to someone who may authorise access.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.

Actions (repository staff only: login required)