White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Negotiation of Responsibility in a Family Therapy Intervention for Adolescents who Self-harm: a Discourse Analysis

Anderson, Rebecca Jane (2018) Negotiation of Responsibility in a Family Therapy Intervention for Adolescents who Self-harm: a Discourse Analysis. D.Clin.Psychol thesis, University of Leeds.

[img]
Preview
Text
Anderson_RJ_Medicine_DClinPsy_2018.pdf - Final eThesis - complete (pdf)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales.

Download (1924Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Systemic interventions, including family therapy (FT), have been found to have positive outcomes for individuals who engage in self-harm behaviour (SHB) (Brent et al., 2013; Carr, 2016; Cottrell et al., 2018b). A number of factors related to family functioning have been associated with SHB (Fortune, Cottrell, & Fife, 2016). Research has shown that narratives of responsibility are an important part of the FT process, however, none investigate how responsibility for self-harm is negotiated in a FT setting. This study uses the discursive action model (DAM, Edwards & Potter, 1993) to explore how responsibility is negotiated within FT for adolescents who have self-harmed. Video data of FT sessions were made available under the access provisions of the Self-Harm Intervention- Family Therapy (SHIFT) Trial (Wright-Hughes et al., 2015; Cottrell et al., 2018b). The findings show that negotiations of responsibility are central to the talk in the initial FT sessions and that family members and therapists managed their interests (stakes) through a variety of actions within the talk. The analysis revealed that family members, in particular the parents, tend to enter therapy with interests which compete with the therapist’s goal of achieving a narrative of shared responsibility. For example, parents entered therapy with actions that managed the risk that they are seen as ‘bad parents’ and responsible for their child’s SHB. It is, therefore, important for therapists to consider how they might negotiate powerful discourses of responsibility, whilst considering the interests of family members and maintaining a therapeutic relationship. I have evidenced the applicability of the DAM in deconstructing the discourse in a FT setting. I suggest its use as a clinical tool in FT practice. Principles from the DAM could be used in identifying the actions and stakes of family members in order to be mindful of these within the FT process.

Item Type: Thesis (D.Clin.Psychol)
Keywords: Discourse Analysis Responsibility Blame Family Therapy Systemic Self-harm Self-injury Adolescents
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > Institute of Health Sciences (Leeds) > Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences (Leeds)
The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds)
Depositing User: Miss Rebecca Jane Anderson
Date Deposited: 29 Oct 2018 13:52
Last Modified: 29 Oct 2018 13:52
URI: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/21588

You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.

Actions (repository staff only: login required)