Rectifying the 'ignoraunce of history' : John Foxe and the collaborative reformation of England's past.

The sixteenth-century Acts and Monuments by John Foxe was more than a martyrology,
which memorialised the persecutions of Mary I's reign. It was also an ecclesiastical
history which saw the Christian past as a battle between the church of Christ and the
church of Antichrist. This thesis identifies the sources that Foxe and his collaborators
used to compile the pre-reformation account in the first two editions of the Acts and
Monuments (1563 and 1570 respectively). Foxe was producing a revisionist history that
saw the past as revelation of prophecy and Scripture. So many of his sources -
chronicles and annals written by monks and clergy - were suspected witnesses, no
longer considered truthful or accurate. Foxe needed to sift through these texts to find
`God's truth' as he understood it, and to rehabilitate certain authorities over others.
Central to this thesis is the contention that Foxe did not do this alone. He worked as
part of an extended network of scholars, printers, and reformers. His predecessor and
mentor, John Bale was a vital foundation for his research; the German ecclesiastical
history usually entitled the Magdeburg Centuries was an enormous influence; and the
`circle' of scholars focused around Archbishop Matthew Parker, proved to be an
invaluable source for rare or hard to find chronicles and annals. This study of Foxe's
pre-reformation sources helps us to understand this collaborative context and to explore
how he came to conceptualise the past and to redefine the interpretation of events and
historical characters. It will, in particular, focus upon the significance of Foxe's
pioneering role in the survival and transmission of manuscript materials relating
especially to the English medieval and Anglo-Saxon past: