White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

On archaeology and alterity.

Denning, Kathryn Eleanor Lillian (1999) On archaeology and alterity. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.

[img] Text (301008.pdf)
301008.pdf

Download (11Mb)

Abstract

Responding effectively to aItemative ideas about humanity's past is a growing concern for many archaeologists, as popular television programs, the Internet, and best-selling books increasing.ly promote theories which dramatically oppose accepted academic archaeological interpretations. However, this problem has traditionally been undertheOlised, or considercd primarily within scientistic fonnulations which simplistically contrast good, logical. '0l1hodox' archaeology with bad, illogicaL 'lunatic fringe' archaeology. As an analysis of some CUlTent ideas about the archaeological past demonstrates, this can be a false dichotomy that impedes constructive thinking. Neither dowsing nor psychic archaeolob'Y, for example, are clearly illogical or marginalised practices~ designating them as such, however, reveals much about a priori convictions. Earth Mystelies in the U.K. has features in common with Blitish academic archaeology. Apocalyptic threads running through some alternative archaeology books are ancient in their structure, not strange and new, and can also emerge in academic archaeological writings. This does not mean that there are no grounds for disting.uishing between different accounts of the past, but it does mean that some standard intolerances within archaeology, based upon notions of demarcation which do not \\ork, must be questioned. Outside the discipline but exerting their influence within it the Skeptics' mO\'cment and the 'anti-anti-Science' contingent of the Science Wars are increasing polarisation around issues of rationality, and responding to divergent ideas inside and outside academia with open hostility. However, there are well-established philosophies that pennit the avoidance of such divisive and all-encompassing conflict. A henneneutic rather than foundationalist approach to the dilemmas of alterity provides more robust and responsible possibilities.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Keywords: Archaeology
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Sheffield) > Archaeology (Sheffield)
The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Science (Sheffield) > Archaeology (Sheffield)
Identification Number/EthosID: uk.bl.ethos.301008
Depositing User: EThOS Import Sheffield
Date Deposited: 13 Apr 2016 11:15
Last Modified: 13 Apr 2016 11:15
URI: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/10220

You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.

Actions (repository staff only: login required)