Hornsby, Ruby Jean
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6099-3660
(2025)
Can humans be friends with social robots?
PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
Abstract
In this thesis, I will argue for three central claims. Firstly [Chapters Two-Five], on my neo-Aristotelian account of friendship, I argue that humans and social robots that currently exist are not engaged in a relationship of friendship. This is because human-robot interaction (HRI) cannot satisfy two conditions that are necessary for friendship: ‘The Mutual Love Condition’ and ‘The Mutual Recognition Condition.’ My second central claim [Chapter Six and Seven] is that some types of HRI are characterisable as quasi-friendships. By ‘quasi-’ I mean ‘apparently but not really.’ These relationships are apparently friendships because humans can imagine that they are friends with a robot (i.e., that the necessary conditions of friendship are met) when they are not. Moreover, these relationships are apparently friendships because humans and robots can manifest, or imitate manifesting, contingent properties that are common to real friendship. For example, gifting, spending time together, and exchanging words of affirmation. This account of quasi-friendship explains the resemblance between human-robot interaction and friendship, and the ethical significance of quasi-friendship, without conceding that humans and robots are in fact friends. My third central claim [Chapter Eight] is that one can demarcate cases where a user is delusional when they are forming quasi-friendships with robots, from cases where they are playing a game, in ways that are ethically significant. I argue that if some humans have a (certain kind of) belief that they are friends with a robot, then they are delusional. By contrast, I argue that other users who do not believe that they are friends with a robot, but who nonetheless imagine that they are friends with a robot (e.g., because they ‘make-believe’ that they are) can be conceptualised as playing an imaginative game of friendship(q) with the robot. I highlight the distinct ethical concerns relevant to each case. Ultimately, I will argue that in either case, human-robot quasi-friendships are not inherently ethically bad and may even be of significant value to some humans. However, I argue that human-robot quasi-friendships are not as valuable as human-human friendships, and they are not welcome in the ideal human life.
Metadata
| Supervisors: | Megone, Christopher and McKeever, Natasha |
|---|---|
| Publicly visible additional information: | The Philosophy of Human-AI Relationships |
| Keywords: | ethics of ai; philosophy of love, sex and relationships; human-ai interaction; friendship; aristotle; ancient philosophy |
| Awarding institution: | University of Leeds |
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Philosophy, Religion and the History of Science |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Mar 2026 13:00 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Mar 2026 13:00 |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:38245 |
Download
Final eThesis - complete (pdf)
Embargoed until: 1 April 2029
Please use the button below to request a copy.
Filename: Hornsby_PhD_VIVAWithCorrections.docx.pdf
Export
Statistics
Please use the 'Request a copy' link(s) in the 'Downloads' section above to request this thesis. This will be sent directly to someone who may authorise access.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.