Butcher, Rory David McDonald
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1841-3977
(2025)
The Fencible Regiments in Britain and Ireland, 1793-1802.
PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
Abstract
Fencible regiments were raised in Britain and Ireland during the French Revolutionary Wars, in response to perceived manpower shortages and the difficulties of enacting the quasi-conscripted militia ballot. These regiments were part of the voluntarily-enlisted regular army, but were limited to only serve within the British Isles and for the duration of the war. Limited service was not a new concept in the 1790s, but the nationwide mobilisation of the fencibles represented a significant departure from previous smaller-scale approaches, which had drawn from the Scottish clan networks. Therefore, although a distinct form of auxiliary military force, historians have previously tended to consider these regiments within the British tradition of amateur military service.
In contrast, this thesis examines the fencibles in their own context. As a liminal space between the regular army and the various militias and civilian auxiliary forces, the fencibles provide insight into a range of interactions between the military and civilian society in this transitional period. Not simply motivated by clan loyalty, the fencible experience demonstrates the agency with which men enlisted and served in the British armed forces. They consciously chose limited service, engaged in contractual negotiations with authority, and often continued onto longer-term military careers. The fencibles especially evidence a contemporary ‘typology’ of different forms of soldiering, reflecting the complex nature of popular engagement with the military. Fencible officers and commanders made use of this distinct form of service to further their careers in the British state, seeing their service as a valuable contribution to the war effort, and to reinforce their own martial masculinity in civilian society. Most prominently, this thesis shows that the fencibles are emblematic of both emerging conceptions of Britishness and of the process by which the ‘four nations’, of the United Kingdom, reimagined themselves in relation to this new unifying nationality.
Metadata
| Supervisors: | Linch, Kevin and Maw, Peter |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | National identity; Britishness; negotiated authority; Contractual soldiering; British army; Amateur military tradition; Fencibles; eighteenth century; Britain and Ireland; United Kingdom; early modern history; Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars; modern history |
| Awarding institution: | University of Leeds |
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of History (Leeds) |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Apr 2026 14:45 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Apr 2026 14:45 |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:38199 |
Download
Final eThesis - complete (pdf)
Embargoed until: 1 April 2029
Please use the button below to request a copy.
Filename: Butcher_RM_History_PhD_2025.pdf
Export
Statistics
Please use the 'Request a copy' link(s) in the 'Downloads' section above to request this thesis. This will be sent directly to someone who may authorise access.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.