Normative Disagreement for Expressivists

The present thesis argues that expressivists can account for normative disagreement in terms of the inability for normative judgements to jointly bring about mental states in a particular agent. I explore existing expressivist-friendly accounts of normative disagreement and disagreement-in-general, and generate success criteria based on their respective successes and failures. I then argue for a particular theory of normative disagreement, demonstrating that it meets these criteria, and succeeds against a number of possible objections that may be raised against it.