Jomeen, Julie (2006) Choice in childbirth : psychology, experiences and understanding. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
Abstract
Current policy (DoH 2004a), in response to critiques of the biomedical model of pregnancy, advocates choice and control for women within maternity care and promotes women as active
childbirth consumers and decision-makers. This model equates choice to increased quality of experience, in the recognition that pregnancy and childbirth are both a physical and psychological experience. However to date the assumed psychological benefit of offering women choice
remains unproven. The aim of this thesis is to explore women's psychology and experiences of pregnancy, and early motherhood, within the context of choice in contemporary maternity care. This will be achieved by assessing the impact of women's pregnancy and childbirth management
choices on psychological well-being in the antenatal and postnatal periods and examining the ways in which women perceive and relate their experiences of pregnancy and childbirth and early motherhood in the context of their choice.
This thesis argues that understanding of women's maternity experiences necessitates a need to go beyond traditional accounts. Whilst it is important to assess how women respond
emotionally to pregnancy, childbirth and new motherhood, there is further a need to comprehend the meanings and understandings that women attach to their maternity
experience. Hence, in an attempt to address its own critique, this study adopts a mixed methodology design and uses both a prospective cohort research design and a narrative approach within a single study. In doing so, it addresses the conflict inherent in the use of
traditionally opposing methodological stances and argues for a pragmatic approach which aims to understand women's psychology and experiences through a multi-dimensional and
integrated frame.
Results revealed that no one care option revealed psychological benefit. The statistically significant differences observed occurred over time and exposed largely corresponding profiles across the groups. The mixed method approach promoted a powerful and illuminating interpretation of the concept of choice in maternity care. Women's narratives revealed the strong and powerful role that maternity influences and discourses play in constructing idealised identities, for women, across their maternity experience. These influences underpin
and inform how women represent their psychological status and both facilitate and/or constrain maternity choices.
Metadata
Supervisors: | Harding, N. and Martin, C. |
---|---|
Awarding institution: | University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) |
Identification Number/EthosID: | uk.bl.ethos.432614 |
Depositing User: | Ethos Import |
Date Deposited: | 14 Mar 2013 10:58 |
Last Modified: | 08 Aug 2013 08:53 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:3746 |
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.