Cinar, Hatice ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3660-5529 (2024) Exploring prioritisation effects across different forms of binding and motivational task contexts in working memory. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
Abstract
In the limited capacity system of working memory (WM), attention can be directed to specific items for prioritisation, based on allocated ‘value’. This thesis investigated how allocated value affects memory performance in WM. Chapter 2 explored prioritisation effects in unitised (coloured shapes) and spatially separated (shape and colour as spatially proximate but separate stimuli) binding in online and lab-based experiments. Three online and one in-person experiments demonstrated that the prioritisation effect could be observed in unitised and spatially separated binding under at least controlled lab setting conditions. Additionally, there was better overall performance in unitised than spatially separated binding. Following that, Chapter 3 explored the prioritisation effect in unitised and cross-modal (shapes presented visually in synchrony with auditory colour names) binding in a lab-based study. A priority boost was observed in the higher-value items in unitised and cross-modal binding, and there were no differences in overall memory performance between binding types. As the online studies in Chapter 2 suggested that allocating attention could be challenging in the online experimental paradigm, Chapters 4 and 5 further explored the priority effect in the online experiments. In Chapter 4, monetary rewards were provided to participants in line with their performance, with a higher monetary reward for the high-value items. However, there was no clear sign of prioritisation. Consequently, to increase motivation in Chapter 5, prioritised items were tested in each trial by testing all items in the sequence. Results showed a clear priority boost. Taken together, this thesis demonstrated that prioritisation effects in WM were evident and equivalent across different binding types in lab settings, whereas this effect was less clear in online experimental settings. However, it can be argued that in the online experimental context, participants can be motivated to show a clear effect by increasing the testing frequency of prioritised items.
Metadata
Supervisors: | Allen, Richard and Waterman, Amanda and Atkinson, Amy |
---|---|
Keywords: | Working Memory, Attention, Prioritisation |
Awarding institution: | University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > Institute of Psychological Sciences (Leeds) |
Academic unit: | School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | Miss Hatice Cinar |
Date Deposited: | 22 Nov 2024 13:12 |
Last Modified: | 22 Nov 2024 13:12 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:35843 |
Download
Final eThesis - complete (pdf)
Filename: Thesis_HC_corrections_28.10.2024.pdf
Licence:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Export
Statistics
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.