Taylor, Douglas ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7572-8747 (2023) How can companies improve their approach to earning the Social Licence to Operate? PhD thesis, University of York.
Abstract
Any project producing environmental or social change within a community has the potential to cause contestation. The Social Licence to Operate (SLO), while ill-defined in the literature, is an intangible concept indicating ongoing project acceptance by stakeholders, may facilitate conflict reduction.
The research aimed to identify and understand the affected communities and other stakeholders, analyse the engagement between the various parties and develop a just and pragmatic schema for earning and granting the SLO.
Addressing gaps or equivocality in the literature through a justice lens, formulated on the African ethical concept of ubuntu, four broad research questions are posed:
1. What is the current understanding of the SLO in the literature and in the way it is being practised?
2. Who are the community/stakeholders that grant the SLO?
3. Why do community/stakeholders support or oppose the company/project?
4. How, through what just engagements, can the company/project earn the SLO?
An interpretive and constructivist approach examines three case studies covering different industries in distinct geographic locations and demonstrates significant commonalities in the many distinct community groupings identified, providing new insights. The communities’ motivations ranged from self or community benefit or impact to significant environmental and ecological concerns. Identifying and understanding the various parties facilitates just engagement.
Engagement requires Procedural, Interactional, Environmental and Distributive Justice, and is not unidirectional, requiring all parties to treat each other with respect and dignity in line with ubuntu’s underpinning principles cohesion and reciprocal value. The ubuntu lens provides a decolonised basis for considering justice, providing the insight that, while communities have the right to award or withdraw the SLO, their actions may affect their rights.
The research concludes with the IUE (Identify, Understand & Engage) Model providing a new understanding of how the SLO is earned and pragmatic enough to be understood and adopted in practice.
Metadata
Supervisors: | Fazey, Ioan |
---|---|
Publicly visible additional information: | The literature review produced a comprehensive definition of the SLO, namely that: An SLO is an intangible and dynamic construct, with no legal status; a continuum; representing ongoing acceptance or implied consent; based on the elements of legitimacy, credibility and trust; that is context, issue and often site-dependent; awarded to an entity by a polymorphous stakeholder community; and warranted by just engagement comprising open and transparent communication and right action. The use of the Ubuntu approach, whereby the actions of all parties should promote cohesion and reciprocal value, led to the insight that the SLO is bidirectional. Furthermore, this approach should facilitate the implementation of the SLO in emerging communities. Finally, the IUE model provides a new understanding of how the SLO is earned and is simple enough to be comprehended and adopted in practice, especially when used in conjunction with the community identification/understanding matrix. |
Keywords: | social licence to operate; SLO; community; identification; understanding; engagement; justice; ubuntu; IUE model. |
Awarding institution: | University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > Environment and Geography (York) |
Depositing User: | Dr Douglas Taylor |
Date Deposited: | 23 May 2024 09:17 |
Last Modified: | 23 May 2024 09:17 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:34931 |
Download
Examined Thesis (PDF)
Export
Statistics
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.