Hurst, Cheryl May Roddy (2020) Interpreting gender equality initiatives: a discourse analytic study in higher education institutions. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
Abstract
This thesis examines women’s continued underrepresentation in leadership roles in higher education institutions by exploring leaders’ constructions of gender equality initiatives. The thesis highlights how leaders contribute to the creation and maintenance of existing organizational culture. The study specifically combines critically-oriented approaches to discourse analysis with the identification of dominant interpretative repertoires to theorize the relationship between leaders’ text and talk and women’s underrepresentation. Through 40 in-depth qualitative interviews with leaders and stakeholders, it contributes to existing literature by identifying conflicting accounts of the values that underpin equality initiatives and by identifying how leaders use pre-existing discourses to legitimize unmeritocratic practices. This demonstrates complex connections embedded within gender (in)equality, discourse, and institutional leadership. When taken together, the findings illustrate that participants construct the need for transformative cultural change while resisting initiatives that lead to this change. This is referred to as the intervention paradox. Thus, although a vocal commitment to gender equality is identified, the paradox that underpins this commitment has ideological consequences for how initiatives are presented by leaders and decision makers. The thesis suggests that this paradox contributes to, and is constitutive of, a process of means-ends decoupling, where the means (initiatives) participants promote are disconnected from the ends (goals). This contributes to existing research by demonstrating that leaders and stakeholders mobilize their discourse to construct gender equality initiatives in a way that promotes and legitimizes their effective commitment to change, and adheres to the overall goals of ‘gender equality’ in institutions, while simultaneously employing discursive strategies that work to maintain and (re)produce the existing status quo.
Metadata
Supervisors: | Tomlinson, Jennifer and Clarke, Jean |
---|---|
Keywords: | gender, inequality, leadership, higher education institutions, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis |
Awarding institution: | University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Leeds University Business School |
Identification Number/EthosID: | uk.bl.ethos.805349 |
Depositing User: | Dr Cheryl Hurst |
Date Deposited: | 18 May 2020 14:24 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2023 09:53 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:26261 |
Download
Final eThesis - complete (pdf)
Filename: hurst_CMR_LUBS_phd_2020.pdf
Licence:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License
Export
Statistics
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.