Corbett, Mark (2019) Quality assessment of healthcare intervention studies in systematic reviews: improving established tools and approaches for context-specific assessments. PhD thesis, University of York.
Abstract
Systematic reviews play an essential role in informing healthcare decision-making. A very important part of the systematic review process is an assessment of the quality of the included studies. This allows differentiation between studies which are methodologically robust and reliable, from studies which may have design weaknesses. Although quality assessment tools currently exist which are established and widely used, they nevertheless continue to develop and evolve.
The main aim of the publications in this thesis is to enhance quality assessment outputs. This should lead to improvements in the value and reliability of systematic review results and conclusions on treatment efficacy and safety. Some papers in the thesis propose improvements to established quality assessment tools: the Cochrane risk of bias tool for assessing randomised trials and QUADAS-2 for diagnostic accuracy studies. These ideas have had an impact. For example, evaluation of patient baseline characteristics has recently been incorporated into the next version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool to improve evaluations of randomisation process biases. Other papers relate to areas of healthcare research where a context-specific approach to quality assessment is needed i.e. where reliance solely on established tools may result in important issues being missed. These papers illustrate the importance of reviewers being aware of the range of issues which might affect the applicability (relevance) of a trial’s results to other patient groups and settings.
Enhanced quality assessment outputs should provide systematic reviewers with a better understanding of study design issues. This should optimise systematic review recommendations for future research, by providing details of the important design issues which need to be addressed, together with suggestions for the most appropriate and viable study designs for future studies to consider.
Metadata
Supervisors: | Eastwood, Alison and McDaid, Catriona |
---|---|
Keywords: | Risk of bias, quality assessment, systematic reviews, randomized trials |
Awarding institution: | University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > Health Sciences (York) |
Identification Number/EthosID: | uk.bl.ethos.829742 |
Depositing User: | Mr Mark Corbett |
Date Deposited: | 10 May 2021 19:43 |
Last Modified: | 21 Jun 2021 09:53 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:24814 |
Download
Examined Thesis (PDF)
Filename: Final version 090919.pdf
Licence:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License
Export
Statistics
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.