Bonewitz, Anna Merrick (2019) Collectively Fashioned: Women, Fancy Dress, and Networks of Representation in British Visual Culture, 1750-1900. PhD thesis, University of York.
Abstract
This thesis furthers the claim that dress was a vital tool for the expression of identity, particularly for women, during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries by considering how women utilized images of dress as part of a networked process of representation. In doing so, it seeks to revive the important role of women in the creation of visual representations of dress, both as subjects and patrons. This thesis demonstrates that, as in the creation of physical costume, costume that is represented in art and visual culture was the result of the agency of a network of individuals, whose relationships were bound through kinship and social networks. Each of the three case studies explores a different visual representation of dress, including painted portraiture, fashion plates and photographs from an ephemeral costume ball. Although each of these chapters engages with a different type of dress and medium of art, they are all united by their focus on historic and exotic impulses in costume: real, imagined and fashionable. Through each of these examples, this thesis charts how fashions migrate across time and space in visual representations of dress, and in the process contribute to the empowering act of representing the collective ideals of women’s networks at regional, national, and international levels. The aims of this thesis are twofold: to draw attention to the importance of visual images of dress to the study of women’s history on account of the messages of representation embedded within them; and secondly to demonstrate the degree to which the creation of such images was a networked process in which women exercised a level of agency that is often not attributed to them in the literature.
Metadata
Supervisors: | Prettejohn, Elizabeth and Wigston Smith, Chloe |
---|---|
Keywords: | Fancy Dress, Fashion History, Portraiture, Print Culture, Fashion Illustration, Women, Eighteenth Century, Nineteenth Century, British Art, Britain, America, Turquerie, Chinoiserie, Historicism, Sir Joshua Reynolds, John Singleton Copley, Nicholas Heideloff, Lafayette, Alice Hughes, Album, Photography, Social Networks, Cross-Cultural Exchange, Femininity, Gender, Thomas Gainsborough, Dress, Agency, Power, Judith Sargent Murray, Boylston Family, Spencer-Churchill Family, Cadogan Family, Cavendish Family |
Awarding institution: | University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > History of Art (York) |
Identification Number/EthosID: | uk.bl.ethos.787386 |
Depositing User: | Miss Anna Merrick Bonewitz |
Date Deposited: | 17 Oct 2019 14:13 |
Last Modified: | 19 Feb 2020 13:08 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:24672 |
Download
Examined Thesis (PDF)
Filename: Anna Bonewitz, Ph.D. Thesis, History of Art Department, University of York, Vol. 1 & 2 (Edited).pdf
Licence:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License
Export
Statistics
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.