Last, Kathryn Victoria (1996) The social and political determinants in the formation and implementation of habitat conservation policy : the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
Abstract
The aim of the thesis is to ascertain the determinants involved in the introduction
of the 'voluntary system' for the protection of habitats in the Wildlife &
Countryside Act 1981 in order to explain its existence and form and also its
effectiveness.
The identification of the determinants involves consideration of a number of
hypotheses. A positive proof shows why the voluntary approach was chosen. A
negative proof shows why the alternatives of using criminal sanctions or planning
control were not chosen. Hypothesis 1 is that the system adopted for species
protection had proved inefficacious and thus criminal sanctions were regarded as
inappropriate for protecting habitats. This hypothesis is disproved. Hypothesis 2 is
that the purpose of the legislation was a determinant. The thesis will show that
there is no positive proof of this hypothesis although there is the possibility of a
negative proof. Hypothesis 3 is that pressure group activity in the pre-parliamentary stages of its enactment was a determinant. This shows a possible
positive proof. Hypothesis 4 is that the influence of pressure groups and
Parliament was a determinant during the parliamentary stages of its enactment. This hypothesis is disproved. Hypothesis 5 is that Thatcherite policy was a
determinant. This shows a negative proof. Hypothesis 6 is that trends in
governmental implementation mechanisms were a determinant in the adoption of
the voluntary approach. This shows both positive and negative proofs.
The determinants in the formation of the system are then reconsidered in the
context of the impact of the system The purpose of the system is then reconsidered
to evaluate the efficacy of the system. This evaluation indicates the predicted
defects of the system that have materialised. The results are then considered in
relation to the implementation of the Habitats Directive. Criteria for reform of the
system are then proposed.
Metadata
Keywords: | Urban planning & rural planning |
---|---|
Awarding institution: | University of Sheffield |
Identification Number/EthosID: | uk.bl.ethos.390469 |
Depositing User: | EThOS Import Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 05 Nov 2012 09:56 |
Last Modified: | 08 Aug 2013 08:47 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:1879 |
Downloads
DX199559_1.pdf
Filename: DX199559_1.pdf
Description: DX199559_1.pdf
DX199559_2.pdf
Filename: DX199559_2.pdf
Description: DX199559_2.pdf
Export
Statistics
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.