Docherty, Benedict Francis ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0013-4677 (2016) Liberal vanguards and the sustainability of the solidarist international society typified by the Responsibility to Protect: The P3 states and the United Nations Security Council in Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and Syria (2010 – 2012). PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
Abstract
This thesis examines how the P3 states (France, the UK and USA) practically resolve
tensions between their liberal preferences, practices of intervention, and the
humanitarian solidarism of contemporary international society typified by R2P. It
argues that where they behave as liberal vanguards, their practice threatens the
sustainability of the solidarist international society typified by R2P. Using the cases
of Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and Syria (2010-2012), it is argued that the P3 states either
discursively advocated or attempted in practice liberal intervention which sought a
change of regime or brought about actual regime change, contrary to the R2P
normative framework which legitimates humanitarian intervention on a case-by case
basis, subject to existing understandings of sovereignty, non-intervention,
non-interference, limits on the use of force and multilateralism. In doing so, the P3
states’ approach to international legitimacy and attitude to international consensus
was such that they behaved in practice as liberal vanguards: denying the gap
between their practices and international norms; being unwilling to compromise
over their goals; fostering and referencing alternative constituencies of legitimation
other than the UN Security Council. These practices threaten the sustainability of
the form of solidarist international society typified by R2P because they: confuse
and potentially erode in practice the consensus understandings of the R2P
normative framework; foster international discord among the great powers and
between them and international society; mean that the Great Powers claim or even
confer international legitimacy for themselves rather than having it conferred by
the authoritative constituency of the UNSC; suggest that these powerful states do
not believe themselves bound by the consensus principles that institute and
constitute the society.
Metadata
Supervisors: | Ralph, Jason and Gallagher, Adrian |
---|---|
Keywords: | UN, UNSC, R2P, P3, P2, P5, legitimacy, consensus, English School, international society, intervention, libya, cote d'ivoire, syria |
Awarding institution: | University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law (Leeds) > School of Politics & International Studies (POLIS) (Leeds) |
Identification Number/EthosID: | uk.bl.ethos.707048 |
Depositing User: | Dr Benedict Docherty |
Date Deposited: | 27 Mar 2017 11:32 |
Last Modified: | 11 Apr 2022 09:53 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:16663 |
Download
Final eThesis - complete (pdf)
Filename: PhD Thesis FINAL.pdf
Licence:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License
Export
Statistics
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.