Tosney, N. B. (2008) Gaming in England, c. 1540-1760. PhD thesis, University of York.
Abstract
This thesis is the first major study of gaming in England between c. 1540 and 1760.
Gaming - which may be defined loosely as games of chance played for stakes
hazarded by the players, especially cards and dice - was rife in early modern
England. People from virtually all social groupings played at cards and at dice and
engaged with gaming in many different ways.
Chapter one provides a narrative of the development of the playing card trade, and
the ways in which it was taxed, in order to place gaming in a broader economic
context. It shows that over one million packs of playing cards were being produced
by the late seventeenth century and examines the fraud and forgery that occurred
after the Stamp Act of 1710 greatly increased the tax on cards. Much gaming was
illegal; and through an analysis of legislation and legal records chapter two
investigates the ways in which gaming, and especially gaming houses, were policed.
Chapter three focuses on the places in which gaming was conducted, including
coffeehouses and alehouses. It also discusses gaming in the home and, more
generally, the ways in which gaming was a part of socialising and sociability.
Chapter four examines printed debates about the morality of gaming, explores
attitudes towards recreation, and explains the ways in which gaming contributed to
early ideas about chance, providence and probability. Seventeenth- and eighteenthcentury
gaming manuals are also considered in detail. The final chapter interrogates
attitudes to cheats and cheating and addresses the ways in which credit - both social
and material - might be constructed or lost at the gaming table.
Metadata
Awarding institution: | University of York |
---|---|
Academic Units: | The University of York > History (York) |
Identification Number/EthosID: | uk.bl.ethos.555870 |
Depositing User: | EThOS Import (York) |
Date Deposited: | 10 Nov 2016 17:20 |
Last Modified: | 10 Nov 2016 17:20 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:14152 |
You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.