White Rose eTheses OnlineManaging Structural Uncertainty in Health Economic Decision ModelsMarkStrongauthorHealth economic models are representations of judgements about the relationships between the model's input parameters and the costs and health effects that the model aims to predict. We recognise that we can rarely define with certainty a 'true' model for a particular decision problem. Building an 'incorrect' model will result in an uncertain prediction error, which we denote 'structural uncertainty'. The absence of observations on the total costs and health effects under each decision option limits the use of data driven approaches to managing structural uncertainty, such as model averaging. We therefore propose a discrepancy based approach in which we make judgements about structural error at the sub-function level within the model and introduce a series of terms to 'correct' the errors. This is deemed to be easier than making meaningful statements about the error at the level of the model output. The specification of discrepancy terms within the model also allows us to use sensitivity analysis methods to determine the relative importance of the different structural uncertainties in driving output and decision uncertainty. Following the computation of either the main effect index or the partial expected value of perfect information for each discrepancy term, we can review the structure of those parts of the model where structural uncertainty is an important source of model output or decision uncertainty. We interpret the overall expected value of perfect information for all the discrepancy terms as an upper bound on the expected value of model improvement (EVMI). We illustrate the sub-function discrepancy method in two case studies: a simple decision tree, and a more complex Markov model. Finally, we propose an efficient method for computing the main effect index and the partial expected value of perfect information when inputs and/or discrepancies are correlated.2012-03-13University of SheffieldThesis

Deposit Licence

Why is a deposit licence required?

This repository supports the long-term preservation of e-prints, and free access to them. To undertake this role, the administrators of the repository need permission to store, copy and manipulate the material in order to ensure that it can be preserved and made available in the future. This Deposit License is designed to give repository administrators the right to do this, and to confirm that the depositor has the right to submit the material to the repository. The Licence is non-exclusive, and the depositor does not give away any of their rights to the repository.

Depositor's Declaration

Covered Work
I would like to deposit my thesis and abstract in the University of Leeds Repository, currently White Rose eTheses Online. Research referred to below as "Work" is covered by this agreement and in depositing my Work I agree to the following:

Non-exclusive rights
Rights granted to the University of Leeds through this agreement are entirely non-exclusive. I am free to publish the Work in its present version or future versions elsewhere. I agree that the University of Leeds or any third party with whom the University of Leeds has an agreement to do so may, without changing content, translate the Work to any medium or format for the purpose of future preservation and accessibility.

Deposit in the University of Leeds Repository (currently White Rose eTheses Online)
I understand that work deposited in the University of Leeds Repository will be accessible to a wide variety of people and institutions - including automated agents - via the World Wide Web. An electronic copy of my thesis may also be included in the British Library Electronic Theses On-line Service (EThOS). I understand that once the Work is deposited, a citation to the Work will always remain visible. Removal of the Work can be made after discussion with the service administrators.

I confirm as follows:

  • That I am the author of the Work and have the authority to make this agreement and to hereby give the University of Leeds the right to make available the Work in the way described above.
  • That the Work is identical to the final, hard bound copy of the thesis and corresponds with those on which the examiners based their recommendation for the award of the degree
  • That I have obtained permission from copyright holders (authors/publishers) in respect of any substantial extracts of third party copyright material that has already been published, which is included within the thesis. Permission obtained specifically includes the right to publish digitally.
  • That I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the Work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law or infringe any third party's copyright or other Intellectual Property Right.
  • The University of Leeds does not hold any obligation to take legal action on behalf of the Depositor, or other rights holders, in the event of breach of intellectual property rights, or any other right, in the material deposited