White Rose eTheses OnlineImproving the outcome of psoriatic arthritisLaura ClaireCoatesauthorPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is recognised to have a significant impact on functional impairment, joint damage and quality of life. The aim of this thesis was to investigate tools for early identification, to develop a clinical target for treatment and to utilise these tools within a clinical trial. The ClASssification of Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria, previously developed in established PsA, were tested in patients with recent onset inflammatory arthritis (PsA and controls) to test their discriminative ability in early arthritis. The phenotype of early PsA was investigated further with clinical and ultrasound (US) assessment. Clinical criteria for minimal disease activity (MDA) were developed using a questionnaire. These were subsequently tested in an observational cohort and interventional trial dataset. Finally, they are being utilised prospectively in an RCT addressing the benefits of tight control in PsA. The CASPAR criteria were found to have good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of recent onset PsA. No individual clinical parameters accurately distinguished PsA from other types of inflammatory arthritis, but there was evidence of more oligoarticular disease and enthesitis in PsA compared with rheumatoid arthritis. US imaging showed a small burden of subclinical arthritis and enthesitis but found good correlation between clinical and imaging assessment of disease activity. Criteria for MDA were developed from expert consensus, covering all aspects of psoriatic disease. They were evaluated against the OMERACT filter and have supporting evidence for their validation in terms of truth, discrimination and feasibility. Early unblinded results from the clinical trial indicated that 53% achieved MDA at 12 months. In summary, the CASPAR criteria can be used for early classification of PsA. In addition, a new composite outcome measure has been developed and validated and is now being utilised in a clinical trial.2010-11University of LeedsThesis

Deposit Licence

Why is a deposit licence required?

This repository supports the long-term preservation of e-prints, and free access to them. To undertake this role, the administrators of the repository need permission to store, copy and manipulate the material in order to ensure that it can be preserved and made available in the future. This Deposit License is designed to give repository administrators the right to do this, and to confirm that the depositor has the right to submit the material to the repository. The Licence is non-exclusive, and the depositor does not give away any of their rights to the repository.

Depositor's Declaration

Covered Work
I would like to deposit my thesis and abstract in the University of Leeds Repository, currently White Rose eTheses Online. Research referred to below as "Work" is covered by this agreement and in depositing my Work I agree to the following:

Non-exclusive rights
Rights granted to the University of Leeds through this agreement are entirely non-exclusive. I am free to publish the Work in its present version or future versions elsewhere. I agree that the University of Leeds or any third party with whom the University of Leeds has an agreement to do so may, without changing content, translate the Work to any medium or format for the purpose of future preservation and accessibility.

Deposit in the University of Leeds Repository (currently White Rose eTheses Online)
I understand that work deposited in the University of Leeds Repository will be accessible to a wide variety of people and institutions - including automated agents - via the World Wide Web. An electronic copy of my thesis may also be included in the British Library Electronic Theses On-line Service (EThOS). I understand that once the Work is deposited, a citation to the Work will always remain visible. Removal of the Work can be made after discussion with the service administrators.

I confirm as follows:

  • That I am the author of the Work and have the authority to make this agreement and to hereby give the University of Leeds the right to make available the Work in the way described above.
  • That the Work is identical to the final, hard bound copy of the thesis and corresponds with those on which the examiners based their recommendation for the award of the degree
  • That I have obtained permission from copyright holders (authors/publishers) in respect of any substantial extracts of third party copyright material that has already been published, which is included within the thesis. Permission obtained specifically includes the right to publish digitally.
  • That I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the Work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law or infringe any third party's copyright or other Intellectual Property Right.
  • The University of Leeds does not hold any obligation to take legal action on behalf of the Depositor, or other rights holders, in the event of breach of intellectual property rights, or any other right, in the material deposited