White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Introducing an evidence based intervention: exploring the experience of collaboration between front-line and specialist practitioners. A thematic analysis

Mayers, Steven Thomas (2016) Introducing an evidence based intervention: exploring the experience of collaboration between front-line and specialist practitioners. A thematic analysis. D.Clin.Psychol thesis, University of Leeds.

[img]
Preview
Text
Steven Mayers DClinPsy July 2016.pdf - Final eThesis - complete (pdf)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales.

Download (8Mb) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: The impact of abuse and neglect on a child, their family and the associated societal costs are well documented. Despite this, there are a limited number of evidence based interventions (EBIs) that are available for families when abuse and neglect is identified and little available guidance for how EBIs should be introduced into existing services. This often results in a gap between the research evidence and clinical practice. Literature focusing on introducing EBIs into existing services identifies collaboration between professionals as a key part of this process. The current research aimed to understand the factors that help and hinder the process of collaboration when an EBI was introduced into an existing service, so that these findings might be applied to other intervention and contexts. Method: This process of collaboration was explored with front-line and specialist practitioners, when an EBI for child abuse and neglect: Multi-Systemic Therapy for Child Abuse and Neglect (MST-CAN), was introduced into Leeds Children’s Social Work Services. Eleven semi-structured interviews were carried out with participants from the social work (n = 6) and MST-CAN team (n = 5). The qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Three key themes emerged from the analysis that described the process of collaboration: ‘adapting the intervention to the local context’, ‘committing to the intervention’ and ‘working together to deliver the intervention’. MST-CAN had to be adapted to fit the local context and practitioners had to commit to the intervention before they could begin working together to deliver it. There were ten sub subthemes from the analysis that related to factors that helped and hindered collaboration between professionals. Discussion: The findings of the current research mirrored some of those from previous research and presented new findings in relation to factors that help and hinder collaboration in the context of children’s social care. The results are considered in relation to models of collaboration, implications for clinical work and future research.

Item Type: Thesis (D.Clin.Psychol)
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > Institute of Health Sciences (Leeds) > Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences (Leeds)
The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds)
Identification Number/EthosID: uk.bl.ethos.695934
Depositing User: Mr S T Mayers
Date Deposited: 17 Oct 2016 11:49
Last Modified: 25 Jul 2018 09:53
URI: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/13873

You do not need to contact us to get a copy of this thesis. Please use the 'Download' link(s) above to get a copy.
You can contact us about this thesis. If you need to make a general enquiry, please see the Contact us page.

Actions (repository staff only: login required)